Re: [Freesurfer] version 6 NOT released yet

2016-08-24 Thread pedrogomesrosa
Many thanks! Pedro Rosa. > On Aug 24, 2016, at 13:48, Iglesias, Eugenio wrote: > > You can! It just makes your results harder to reproduce (running recon-all > with one version, and the subfields with the other). > > Juan Eugenio Iglesias > Translational Imaging Group > University College Lo

Re: [Freesurfer] version 6 NOT released yet

2016-08-24 Thread Iglesias, Eugenio
You can! It just makes your results harder to reproduce (running recon-all with one version, and the subfields with the other). Juan Eugenio Iglesias Translational Imaging Group University College London http://www.jeiglesias.com http://cmictig.cs.ucl.ac.uk/ On 24 Aug 2016, at 17:01, Douglas Gr

Re: [Freesurfer] version 6 NOT released yet

2016-08-24 Thread Douglas Greve
I don't know. This is a question for Eugenio On 8/24/16 11:53 AM, pedrogomesr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Doug. Is it possible to run FreeSurfer 6 Hippocampal-subfields on FreeSurfer 5.3 recons, or this also should not be done? Best, Pedro Rosa. On Aug 24, 2016, at 11:58, Douglas Greve

Re: [Freesurfer] version 6 NOT released yet

2016-08-24 Thread pedrogomesrosa
Hi, Doug. Is it possible to run FreeSurfer 6 Hippocampal-subfields on FreeSurfer 5.3 recons, or this also should not be done? Best, Pedro Rosa. > On Aug 24, 2016, at 11:58, Douglas Greve wrote: > > > PLEASE DO NOT USE ANYTHING LABELLED AS "6.0" FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN > TESTING. WHEN WE RELEA

[Freesurfer] version 6 NOT released yet

2016-08-24 Thread Douglas Greve
PLEASE DO NOT USE ANYTHING LABELLED AS "6.0" FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN TESTING. WHEN WE RELEASE 6.0 WE WILL MAKE AN ANNOUNCEMENT. Thanks The FreeSurfer Team ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/ma