Hi Tapsya,
If you want to supply a registration to bbregister, then use --init-reg
(and don't use --init-fsl). The xopts should give you the same result as
the first command.
doug
tap...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> As mentioned below (by Dr. Tommi), bbregister with the flag --t1 do
Hi Doug,
As mentioned below (by Dr. Tommi), bbregister with the flag --t1 does
provide better results. i.e.
>>bbregister --init-fsl --s avml07 --bold --mov bold/template.nii.gz --reg
bold/register.dof6.dat --init-reg-out bold/init.register.dof6.dat --t1
However, supplying register.dat (from old
That should work, but it should not register anyway (unless the raw data
or template change).
doug
r...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> You are absolutely right - I should have noticed the T1 warning in the
> bbregister logs. I guess funny things can happen when scanning with a
> short
Hi Doug,
You are absolutely right - I should have noticed the T1 warning in the
bbregister logs. I guess funny things can happen when scanning with a
short (1.15 sec) TR without fat suppression (also this was Trio before the
Tim upgrade and multichannel arrays).
We tried bbregister with t1 weight
wow, that's interesting. Your data is actually T1 weighted! There are a
couple of things you can do. First, you can copy your register.dat over
the register.dof6.dat. An alternative is to run register-sess
(bbregister) with t1 weighting. You can do this by creating a file with
the line "--t1" i
Hi Doug,
We have an old EPI data set where automatic (preproc-sess) or bbregister
with any init type give a bad result. Hence, we are attempting to use a
manual register.dat file instead. However, we must be doing something
wrong, because changing preproc-sess to use our manual register.dat (done
