9:58 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] parameterization template and the vertex in the pial
surface
You are right except for the last step. The surfaces are not retessellated to a
common space. When it comes time for group analysis, overlays (eg, thickness)
are
Hi Pam
Yes, that’s pretty accurate.
Cheers
Bruce
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
On Behalf Of Pam Garcia
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 9:40 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] parameterization template and the vertex in the pial
surface
You are right except for the last step. The surfaces are not
retessellated to a common space. When it comes time for group analysis,
overlays (eg, thickness) are sampled into the group space (not the
surfaces themselves)
On 9/24/2020 9:40 PM, Pam Garcia wrote:
External Email - Use Ca
External Email - Use Caution
Thanks for your response Bruce, just to clarify
If I understood, the wm surface is created using a surface deformation
procedure that adaptively determined the MR intensity of the boundaries in
question at each point in the cortex. Next a sphere from
