Randwick Sydney NSW 2031 AustraliaT +61 2 9399 1268
From: " andreia " <_andre...@sapo.pt>To: "Bruce Fischl" Cc: "Julia Hill" , freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduSent: Friday, 17 February, 2012 1:01:06 AMSubject: Re: [Freesurfer] optic nerve inlcuded as pial matt
Since it is such a straightforward correction, I've been making it
because I thought that it would have some effect (though tiny).
Thanks!
Andreia
Citando Bruce Fischl :
> yes, exactly. it will have a tiny effect on total surface area, but
> that includes noncortical regions anyway
> On Thu,
yes, exactly. it will have a tiny effect on total surface area, but that
includes noncortical regions anyway
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, _andre...@sapo.pt
wrote:
Ah ok! :)
So it won't affect any stats?
Anyway, not correcting this will make the inflated surface to have a
prominence, right? In that
Ah ok! :)
So it won't affect any stats?
Anyway, not correcting this will make the inflated surface to have a
prominence, right? In that case it will only look better for results'
displaying.
Andreia
Citando Bruce Fischl :
> if they are coincident then it is accurately detected as
> non-
if they are coincident then it is accurately detected as non-cortical and
won't affect any thickness/volume corrections, so fixing it is really
just aesthetic.
cheer
Bruce
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, _andre...@sapo.pt wrote:
Hi Julia,
I usually remove the voxels from brainmaks.mgz for the pial ed
Hi Julia,
I usually remove the voxels from brainmaks.mgz for the pial edits but also
from wm.mgz. If you deselect the button of the pial surface in tkmedit, you
will see that the white matter surface is coincident with the pial, so you
also need to correct that volume. With wm.mgz as auxi
Dear all,
Do you recomend to routinely erase the optic nerve (regardless of how
the wm surface looks), and where in the work flow do you recomend to do
it? (We do it as part of the quality control after autorecon1 now.)-- yours,LMR
___
Freesurfer mailin
