hmmm, maybe the nonlinearities between days are too big for the
registration.
Bruce
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Garikoitz Lerma Usabiaga wrote:
> Many thanks Bruce,
> I will choose the best one in this case.
>
> The command line was:
> recon-all -s B_06 -qcache -measure thickness -all
> (I already had
Many thanks Bruce,
I will choose the best one in this case.
The command line was:
recon-all -s B_06 -qcache -measure thickness -all
(I already had copied by hand the /mri/orig/001.mgz and 002.mgz)
Just in case I repeated the process with the original files, but I had exactly
the same results.
what was your command line (now I sound like Doug)? Including structurals
from different days may not work as you may have large differential
distortions due to differences in e.g. shimming, gradient nonlinearities,
etc... that will preclude an accurate motion correction. Certainly it
failed in
Hi Gari
is it still running? The time it takes is square in the convex hull of the
largest defect, so that can take a long time. A 45K defect is too big and
typically means something is dramatically wrong, like the cerebellum or
skull is attached.
cheers
Bruce
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012, Garikoitz
Hi FS experts,
I've run recon-all -i file -s subject -qcache -measure thickness -all to:
- 18 subjects, session 1 T1
- same 18 subjects, session 2 T1
and everything went well.
Then I copied the /mri/orig/001.mgz-s to
/mri/orig/001.mgz and 002.mgz, and run the same command again:
recon-all -s
