Hi Satra,
there is a random element to it. The GCSANclassify: could not find GCS
for node 0! was a bug that somehow got into the atlas, and has been fixed.
Do the outputs look pretty much the same?
cheers,
Bruce
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Satrajit Ghosh wrote:
I'm noticing some discrepancies bet
I'm noticing some discrepancies between the 64 bit and the 32 bit version of
mris_ca_label. I've shown the output from the 64 bit version and the 32 bit
version operating on the same subject. I'm using are the dev versions for
centos from the download site.
To note:
1. In the 64 bit version I get
