Dear Doug,
thank you for the clarification.
So to make sure, do you use this group_avg_area for each vertex also for
building null distribution of maximal cluster size? The area values in .csd
files are values of group_avg_area of cluster with maximal group_avg_area in
each simulation step?
Loo
It is quite confusing and took us some time to understand ourselves.
When we create an average subject like fsaverage, we have to create a
triangular mesh just like we do with any subject. This means that we
have to assign an xyz to each coordinate. When trying to represent a
group, this is not
Dear Doug,
thank you very much for the support.
I am quite confused by this info about correcting of area of fsaverage
clusters. Could you please clarify to me the following:
How exactly the values of lh.area, lh.white.avg.area.mgh of fsaverage were
computed?
How the cluster area inside mri_s
On 04/11/2016 04:46 PM, Antonin Skoch wrote:
> Dear FreeSurfer experts,
>
> I am using mri_surfcluster to compare results from PALM and FreeSurfer
> cluster extent inference.
>
> I came across several issues in mri_surfcluster I cannot cope with.
>
> 1.
> I observed that --mask option in mri_sur
Dear FreeSurfer experts,
I am using mri_surfcluster to compare results from PALM and FreeSurfer cluster
extent inference.
I came across several issues in mri_surfcluster I cannot cope with.
1.
I observed that --mask option in mri_surfcluster does not prevent cluster to
growing outside the mas
