Re: [Freesurfer] mri_glmfit with pvr

2021-06-20 Thread Douglas N. Greve
You need to include elements for the PVR regressors in your contrast. I see that you only have four elements in the examples below and four classes, so you will need to add more On 6/9/2021 10:38 AM, std...@virgilio.it wrote: External Email - Use Caution Thanks If I have 4 groups G

[Freesurfer] mri_glmfit with pvr

2021-06-10 Thread stdp82
External Email - Use Caution Thanks If I have 4 groups GroupDescriptorFile 1 Title XXX Class G1 Class G2 Class G3 Class G4 Input subj1 G1 Input subj2 G3 Input subj3 G2 Input subj4 G2 Input subj5 G4 Are the contrasts below corrected? G1_only_thick 1 0 0 0 G2_only_t

[Freesurfer] mri_glmfit with pvr

2021-06-09 Thread stdp82
External Email - Use Caution Thanks If I have 4 groups GroupDescriptorFile 1 Title XXX Class G1 Class G2 Class G3 Class G4 Input subj1 G1 Input subj2 G3 Input subj3 G2 Input subj4 G2 Input subj5 G4 Are the contrasts below corrected? G1_only_thick 1 0 0 0 G2_only_th

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_glmfit with pvr: how to include pvr in the fsgd file?

2011-08-03 Thread Burzynska, Aga
Great news, thank you, Doug! Best, aga On 8/3/11 5:02 PM, "Douglas N Greve" wrote: >Hi Aga, what you have done is correct, no need to include the pvr in the >fsgd. >doug > >Burzynska, Aga wrote: >> Dear all, >> I am trying to make group level analysis of functional data on the >>surface and add

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_glmfit with pvr: how to include pvr in the fsgd file?

2011-08-03 Thread Douglas N Greve
Hi Aga, what you have done is correct, no need to include the pvr in the fsgd. doug Burzynska, Aga wrote: > Dear all, > I am trying to make group level analysis of functional data on the surface > and add per-vertex regressors (PVR, here: cortical thickness) into the > design. When I view the r

[Freesurfer] mri_glmfit with pvr: how to include pvr in the fsgd file?

2011-08-01 Thread Burzynska, Aga
Dear all, I am trying to make group level analysis of functional data on the surface and add per-vertex regressors (PVR, here: cortical thickness) into the design. When I view the results I have the feeling that the PVR is not really included in the model: I am using the command: mri_glmfit --