Hi Bruce,
Great! Thanks for replying so quickly! Is there any way I or someone can add
links to the articles on the corresponding wiki pages?
Cheers!
Ruy
> On Jan 24, 2018, at 5:28 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
>
> Hi Ruy,
>
> yes, that is all correct. The last one (and the follow-on article about
Hi Ruy,
yes, that is all correct. The last one (and the follow-on article about
diffusion with Lilla Zollei as first author) is about CVS (combined
volume and surface registration)
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, Ricardo Valle wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I would like to confirm the relationship betw
Hi Bruce,
I would like to confirm the relationship between a few papers and the
algorithms they describe.
Does Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance images (Fischl et
al., 2004) describe mri_ca_register, Whole Brain Segmentation: Automated
Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structur
I see. Thank you very much!
Cheers,
Ruy
> On Jan 18, 2018, at 1:24 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
>
> Hi Ruy
>
> they both register to a .gca atlas that is quite a bit more accurate than
> the MNI. The details are in the 2002 and 2004 papers.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2018,
> Ricardo Valle
Hi Ruy
they both register to a .gca atlas that is quite a bit more accurate than
the MNI. The details are in the 2002 and 2004 papers.
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018,
Ricardo Valle wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer community,
>
> I would like to get a better sense of how mri_em_register and mri_ca_re
Dear Freesurfer community,
I would like to get a better sense of how mri_em_register and mri_ca_register
work. I understand the former is a linear registration and the latter is
nonlinear, and that they are both meant to register an individual to a template
space (MNI152?).
Would it be possib
