I believe we are using the CentOS version. I am downloading the RH9
distro for version 3.0.3 to see if that will work for us.
Chuck
Nick Schmansky wrote:
Chuck,
Which freesurfer is installed? The rh9 freesurfer dist is built against
libstdc++.so.5 (which many systems dont have), whereas the
Chuck,
Which freesurfer is installed? The rh9 freesurfer dist is built against
libstdc++.so.5 (which many systems dont have), whereas the centos
freesurfer dist uses .6.
Nick
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 14:13 -0700, Chuck Theobald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> No, we have sufficient disk space on each machine.
>
you might check the MNI list to see if this is a known issue for them.
On
Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Chuck Theobald wrote:
Hi,
No, we have sufficient disk space on each machine.
This used to work, but started failing following upgrades to system files. I
suspect libc.so.6 or libm.so.6, since mincin
Hi,
No, we have sufficient disk space on each machine.
This used to work, but started failing following upgrades to system
files. I suspect libc.so.6 or libm.so.6, since mincinfo is linked to
both, and both were part of the upgrade, but I don't have anything
specific pointing to this as the c
Hi Chuck,
is that partition full?
Bruce
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Chuck Theobald wrote:
Hi,
Following some system upgrade to our Linux 2.6 systems, freesurfer has ceased
to work. When running recon-all on bert, we get a message referring to a
broken pipe and a crash in mincinfo. We are running G
Hi,
Following some system upgrade to our Linux 2.6 systems, freesurfer has
ceased to work. When running recon-all on bert, we get a message
referring to a broken pipe and a crash in mincinfo. We are running Gentoo:
doolin ~ # uname -a
Linux doolin 2.6.21-gentoo-r4 #1 SMP Thu Aug 9 09:33:11 PD
