I've looked briefly at this with out data and cannot find any such bias
to one side or another. Do you have reason to believe that it actually
exists in your patient population? Do the images have any strong
intensity gradients from right to left? Another option is to take one or
two of your su
Hi all,
The total rh surface is always bigger than the lh surface (I've checked also
the cerebral cortex volumes and the rh are also bigger than the lh volumes).
I have the rh_medialorbitofrontal area bigger in 30 of my 32 subjects, but when
I compare the lateralorbitofrontalareas, these appear
ng columns from different
regions.
Best,
Mike
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior"
To: Jose Soares
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:01:39 -0300
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] medialorbitofrontal_area
It's not unusual to have asymmetries in s
What's the total surface area of the rh? Is it bigger than the lh?
On Fri,
13 Aug 2010, Jose Soares wrote:
What is the best way to check the segmentation in medialorbitofrontal area?
I have almost every subjects with this abnormal areas on rh. They are from
healthy population.
Thanks for th
What is the best way to check the segmentation in medialorbitofrontal area?
I have almost every subjects with this abnormal areas on rh. They are from
healthy population.
Thanks for the help,
Miguel.
It's not unusual to have asymmetries in some patients. I have seen some myself
in AD. Have y
It's not unusual to have asymmetries in some patients. I have seen some
myself in AD. Have you checked the segmentation in those areas?
-
Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior
Diretor de Operações
Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom
Hi all,
I am doing a study about the medialorbitofrontal, and I am having some strange
area results in a lot of subjects.
The rh areas are much higher than the lh areas of medialorbitofrontal: Some
examples:
lh rh
1714.0
2822.0
1720
