hmmm...i think it depends on whether the two ends of the bow-tie are ever
in the same hemifield simultaneously, which would lead to ambiguity in the
mapping of stimulus phase. scott slotnick had a paper on this a few years
back...
in principle the bow-tie stimulus for mapping polar angle is more
I'm not sure. So the stimulus uses a bow tie instead of a wedge? Maybe
Jon has an idea.
On 04/01/2012 02:22 PM, Kiley Seymour wrote:
> Dear freesurfers,
>
> I am wondering whether there is a simple way of analysing retinotopy
> data that was collected using a rotating bow-tie stimulus? Or should
Dear freesurfers,
I
am wondering whether there is a simple way of analysing retinotopy data
that was collected using a rotating bow-tie stimulus? Or should I
somehow artificially segment the cycle into different visual field
poition conditions and run a glm analysis? I just realised I have made
a
