Re: [Freesurfer] lh.BA.annot vs lh.BA.thresh.annot ... generalization question

2014-09-11 Thread Krieger, Donald N.
> boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl > Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 8:26 AM > To: Freesurfer support list > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] lh.BA.annot vs lh.BA.thresh.annot ... generalization > question > > Hi Don > > no, it doesn't make sense for the apar

Re: [Freesurfer] lh.BA.annot vs lh.BA.thresh.annot ... generalization question

2014-09-11 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Don no, it doesn't make sense for the aparc since it is a complete tiling of the surface. Each point is assigned the most likely label with no holes, so no thresholding is needed. cheers Bruce On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Krieger, Donald N. wrote: Hi Anastasia or anyone,   Are there any other

[Freesurfer] lh.BA.annot vs lh.BA.thresh.annot ... generalization question

2014-09-11 Thread Krieger, Donald N.
Hi Anastasia or anyone, Are there any other groups of labels which are, by default, produced in comparable less vs more restrictive ways? For instance, is there a way to produce lh.aparc.thresh.annot with comparably constrained labels? And does it make sense to do so? Regards, Don