> boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 8:26 AM
> To: Freesurfer support list
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] lh.BA.annot vs lh.BA.thresh.annot ... generalization
> question
>
> Hi Don
>
> no, it doesn't make sense for the apar
Hi Don
no, it doesn't make sense for the aparc since it is a complete tiling of
the surface. Each point is assigned the most likely label with no holes,
so no thresholding is needed.
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Krieger, Donald N. wrote:
Hi Anastasia or anyone,
Are there any other
Hi Anastasia or anyone,
Are there any other groups of labels which are, by default, produced in
comparable less vs more restrictive ways?
For instance, is there a way to produce lh.aparc.thresh.annot with comparably
constrained labels?
And does it make sense to do so?
Regards,
Don