gt; > > Hi Stefano - Did you try CVS for the inter-subject registration? It
> > > doesn't look like it from the configuration file.
> > >
> > > a.y
> > >
> > > On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, std...@virgilio.it wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Anastasia,
> >
; > > Ogg: Re: [Freesurfer] R: Re: incomplete tracts
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Stefano - Did you try CVS for the inter-subject registration? It
> > > doesn't look like it from the configuration file.
> > >
> > > a.y
> > >
> > > O
Are you running this on your own subject or the tutorial subject?
Please include the freesurfer list on all emails with tracula questions.
Thanks,
a.y
On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, Gerit Pfuhl wrote:
Dear Anastasia,
I got some improvement by setting nctps to 7 (as I had done last week with
version 5
@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Data: 5-apr-2013 18.45
> A:
> Cc: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"
> Ogg: Re: R: Re: [Freesurfer] incomplete tracts
>
>
> Hi Stefano - In your case we determined that the ones that had the low-b
> volume in the end didn't run correctly, right?
check it please.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Stefano
>
> Messaggio originale
> Da: ayend...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Data: 5-apr-2013 18.45
> A:
> Cc: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"
> Ogg: Re: R: Re: [Freesurfer] incomplete tracts
>
>
> Hi
Hi Gerit - If it's not an issue with the gradient table but instead a
tractography initialization issue, I strongly recommend running 5.2 with
bbregister for the registration (which is the default in 5.2 anyway).
You can also upload an example data set with issues (include: dmri,
dmri.bedpostX
Dear Anastasia,
thanks for the help. There is also a line option in freeview. However we
still have brains with missing tracks, I rerun them with increasing the
ncpts and registering to bbr (since that is default in Tracula 5.2.). We
are reasonable confident that our bvel and bvac are correct, sin
Hi Benjamin - I'd look in a coronal view to see if the lines in the corpus
callosum follow the curvature of the corpus callosum, and in a sagittal
view to see if the lines in the cingulum follow the curvature of the
cingulum. Does this make sense?
a.y
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Roschinski, Benjamin
Dear Anastasia,
we dislpayed dtifit_V1 as lines, overlaid on dtifit_FA because our gradient
table is wrong but I am not really sure how to analyse these informations. You
wrote to Stefano the lines have to point in the right direction and that the
eigenvectors are not pointing along his corpus
