Re: [Freesurfer] inclusion of both T1 and T2 in a recon-all run

2016-09-01 Thread Bruce Fischl
actually I had forgotten that we described the basic surface deformation to avoid dura in Andre's paper, which is what I first wrote it for: 2008 Brain morphometry with multiecho MPRAGE. van der Kouwe, Andre J W; Benner, Thomas; Salat, David H and Fischl, Bruce NeuroImage, 2008. On Tue, 3

Re: [Freesurfer] inclusion of both T1 and T2 in a recon-all run

2016-08-30 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Matt I don't think that counts as a methods paper for the T2-based deformation. There is no validation or comparison with other methods in it, and really not enough detail to replicate what we did. cheers Bruce On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Matt Glasser wrote: Sure there¹s a publication. See F

Re: [Freesurfer] inclusion of both T1 and T2 in a recon-all run

2016-08-30 Thread Matt Glasser
Sure there¹s a publication. See Figure 14: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811913005053 Peace, Matt. On 8/30/16, 10:21 AM, "Bruce Fischl" wrote: >Hi Don > >the T2 or FLAIR helps us avoid dura. It is still a beta version though as >we don't have a ton of experience with

Re: [Freesurfer] inclusion of both T1 and T2 in a recon-all run

2016-08-30 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Don the T2 or FLAIR helps us avoid dura. It is still a beta version though as we don't have a ton of experience with it, and no, there is no reference for it yet (or maybe ever) :) Bruce On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Krieger, Donald N. wrote: Dear list:   What are the advantages of including

Re: [Freesurfer] inclusion of both T1 and T2 in a recon-all run

2016-08-30 Thread Harms, Michael
x27;Freesurfer support list' <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 at 9:25 AM To: 'Freesurfer support list' <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] inclusion of both T1 and T2 in a recon-all run Thank you – very h

Re: [Freesurfer] inclusion of both T1 and T2 in a recon-all run

2016-08-30 Thread Krieger, Donald N.
Thank you - very helpful. Best - Don From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas Greve Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 10:23 AM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] inclusion of both T1 and T2 in a

Re: [Freesurfer] inclusion of both T1 and T2 in a recon-all run

2016-08-30 Thread Douglas Greve
ps. The 5.3 version is pretty buggy, so I'd wait until 6.0 to test it out On 8/30/16 10:12 AM, Krieger, Donald N. wrote: Dear list: What are the advantages of including a T2 scan when running recon-all –all ? Which results can it effect and to what extent? And how sensitive is freesurfer

Re: [Freesurfer] inclusion of both T1 and T2 in a recon-all run

2016-08-30 Thread Douglas Greve
Hi Don, the T2 stream is a work-in-progress, so we don't have a lot of these answers. In theory, a T2 will allow better placement of the pial surface allowing it to better exclude dura. No publication on this yet. doug On 8/30/16 10:12 AM, Krieger, Donald N. wrote: Dear list: What are t

[Freesurfer] inclusion of both T1 and T2 in a recon-all run

2016-08-30 Thread Krieger, Donald N.
Dear list: What are the advantages of including a T2 scan when running recon-all -all ? Which results can it effect and to what extent? And how sensitive is freesurfer to artifacts in the T2 scan? Is there a good reference for this/ Thanks and best - Don