d.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Anthony Dick
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:12 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] grossly abormal brain
Don, if that doesn't work, try the procedure outlined in this paper, although
it
Don, if that doesn't work, try the procedure outlined in this paper,
although it is rather involved:
http://www.architalbiol.org/index.php/aib/article/viewArticle/1221
Anthony
On 11/17/15 8:27 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Don
it's impossible to say. Certainly 6.0 will be your best bet as it
h
Hi Don
it's impossible to say. Certainly 6.0 will be your best bet as it handles
enlarged ventricles much better. Try 6.0 beta with the -bigventricles
flag and see how it goes
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Krieger, Donald N. wrote:
A few cuts from a grossly abnormal scan are attached.
A few cuts from a grossly abnormal scan are attached.
Do you think freesurfer can effectively segment this one?
If so, please point us in the right direction to get started with it.
Thanks. - Don
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
