] Im Auftrag von clelia pellicano
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Juli 2015 18:55
An: Freesurfer support list
Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] correction for field dishomogeneity
I did it. Thank you very much.
C
Il giorno 03/lug/2015 18:51, "Bruce Fischl"
mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> ha s
I did it. Thank you very much.
C
Il giorno 03/lug/2015 18:51, "Bruce Fischl" ha
scritto:
> not sure. Did you use recon-all? If so, then you did use
> "the appropriate pipeline provided by freesurfer"
> On Fri, 3 Jul
> 2015, clelia pellicano wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > thank you for your r
not sure. Did you use recon-all? If so, then you did use
"the appropriate pipeline provided by freesurfer"
On Fri, 3 Jul
2015, clelia pellicano wrote:
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> thank you for your reply. Do you have any idea about what they could mean
> saying "without using the appropriate pipeline pro
Hi Bruce,
thank you for your reply. Do you have any idea about what they could mean
saying "without using the appropriate pipeline provided by freesurfer"?
Thanks
BW
C
Il giorno 03/lug/2015 15:32, "Bruce Fischl" ha
scritto:
> Hi Clelia
>
> yes, we correct for field inhomogeneity. Presumably th
Hi Clelia
yes, we correct for field inhomogeneity. Presumably they mean the B1
receive field, which is what is typically meant in structurals. If they
mean B0, we don't typically correct (nor do most people for structural
imaging - this is more of an issue for diffusion and functional MRI).
ch
Dear experts,
I was wondering how freesurfer corrects for field dishomogeneity.
As long as I know, it's automatically done by the software .
My concern is because a reviewer has made this comment (please find it
below):
"Authors used an old 3 T MRI without using the appropriate pipeline
provided
