lestown MA 02129
(617)-724-8823
*From:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
on behalf of Douglas N. Greve
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:10 AM
*To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
*Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] WM
urfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
on behalf of Douglas N. Greve
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:10 AM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] WM volume
Yes, that is the right value. We changed the name of it in more recent versions
to CerebralWhiteMatter
On 2/22/2021 4:12 PM
Yes, that is the right value. We changed the name of it in more recent
versions to CerebralWhiteMatter
On 2/22/2021 4:12 PM, Barletta, Valeria wrote:
Dear Freesurfers,
In what file inside the patient_name/stats folder do I find the total
white matter volume?
In the file "aseg.stats" there is s
Dear Freesurfers,
In what file inside the patient_name/stats folder do I find the total white
matter volume?
In the file "aseg.stats" there is something called lh/rh "cortical white matter
volume", is that the right value to look at?
Thank you,
Valeria Barletta, MD
Massachusetts General Hospita
nope, as long as the white surface is accurate you should be all set.
cheers
Bruce
On
Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Michael Davies wrote:
>
> Hello, i am currently looking at the WM Volume in heat mode and am curious
> as to if i need to fill in all the small missing voxels located within the
> boundary
Hello, i am currently looking at the WM Volume in heat mode and am curious as
to if i need to fill in all the small missing voxels located within the
boundary as well as the bigger holes?
Kind regards, Michael
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nm
] On Behalf Of Douglas Greve
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 10:18 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] wm- volume limitations
the wmparc gets the cortical parcellation of the closest cortical parcellation
(not necessarily normal to the surface). I think it has to be within
the wmparc gets the cortical parcellation of the closest cortical
parcellation (not necessarily normal to the surface). I think it has to
be within 5mm of cortex or else it gets "Unsegmented White Matter". The
method is described here
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19027860
On 7/7/15
Freesurfer provides ctx- and wm- volumes on either side of the "white" labelled
sheet, all for a particular cortical region.
What is the idea which is used to limit the extent of the wm- volume which is
adjacent to a particular ctx- volume?
Is it as simple as a maximum distance normal to the whi
what kind of image do you mean?
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Damian Jenkins wrote:
Whilst estimating white matter volume using mris_wm_volume is it possible to
save an image for inspection?
Dr Damian Jenkins
Department of Clinical Neurology
Oxford University
__
Whilst estimating white matter volume using mris_wm_volume is it possible to
save an image for inspection?
Dr Damian Jenkins
Department of Clinical Neurology
Oxford University
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.
mgh.harvard.edu
>Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] WM volume & CSF & BPF
>
>On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Gallo, Antonio (NIH/NINDS) [F] wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> We are dealing with MPRAGE data acquired at a 3.0T MRI scanner and
>> analyzed with FS 3.0.5.
>
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Gallo, Antonio (NIH/NINDS) [F] wrote:
Dear All,
We are dealing with MPRAGE data acquired at a 3.0T MRI scanner and
analyzed with FS 3.0.5.
Images belong to a group of Multiple Sclerosis patients.
We would like to ask some questions and we apologize for the fact that
we
Dear All,
We are dealing with MPRAGE data acquired at a 3.0T MRI scanner and
analyzed with FS 3.0.5.
Images belong to a group of Multiple Sclerosis patients.
We would like to ask some questions and we apologize for the fact that
we have quite a number of them :-)
First, regarding measure
sure. There are white matter parcellation schemes around, but we don't
have one at the moment.
cheers,
Bruce
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Lars Tjelta Westlye wrote:
Thanks for your swift reply, Bruce!
I don't know how the lobar drawing would be done, but am curious if there
exist any kind of 'predefined r
Thanks for your swift reply, Bruce!
I don't know how the lobar drawing would be done, but am curious if there
exist any kind of 'predefined regions' that could further refine the
estimates of the total wm volume. It could be interesting to estimate
where the wm loss is most prominent in aging, for
you can get an estimate by loading the filled volume into matlab and
counting the # of 127 (rh) and 255 (lh). Nothing lobar though - what would
it mean? Where would you draw the borders?
cheers,
Bruce
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Lars Tjelta
Westlye wrote:
Hi all,
is there a way I can attain the total
Hi all,
is there a way I can attain the total wm volume for each of the
hemispheres? And is it possible to estimate the wm volume of certain
gross anatomical areas, like the different lobes?
Thanks!
Best wishes,
Lars Tjelta Westlye
___
Freesurfer m
18 matches
Mail list logo
