Re: [Freesurfer] Surface Area and Cortical Volume

2010-09-30 Thread Michael Harms
Jeff, Posting this back to the list so that others can see your reply. cheers, -MH Forwarded Message From: Jeff Sadino To: Michael Harms Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Surface Area and Cortical Volume Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:29:45 -1000 Hi Michael, After reading your answer

Re: [Freesurfer] Surface Area and Cortical Volume

2010-09-30 Thread Nick Schmansky
mail.com > > Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:57:38 -1000 > > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > Subject: [Freesurfer] Surface Area and Cortical Volume > > > > Hello, > > > > As I understand it, the surface area measure is not a real surface > > area measur

Re: [Freesurfer] Surface Area and Cortical Volume

2010-09-29 Thread Douglas Greve
The surface area is the actual area of the surface. I think you may be thinking of the jacobian, which measures the amount of stretching needed to register with the surface atlas. Total cortical volume is available from the "header" of the aseg.stats file, and that is a surface-based measure.

Re: [Freesurfer] Surface Area and Cortical Volume

2010-09-29 Thread Don Hagler
p 2010 15:57:38 -1000 > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Subject: [Freesurfer] Surface Area and Cortical Volume > > Hello, > > As I understand it, the surface area measure is not a real surface > area measure. It is more a measure of how much the brain has to be > st

[Freesurfer] Surface Area and Cortical Volume

2010-09-29 Thread Jeff Sadino
Hello, As I understand it, the surface area measure is not a real surface area measure. It is more a measure of how much the brain has to be stretched in order to get into a common space. My question is that if the cortical volume is calculated by multiplying the thickness and the surface area (