Re: [Freesurfer] Speeding up mris_fix_topology

2013-01-16 Thread Bruce Fischl
Fischl An: "Falk Lüsebrink" CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Speeding up mris_fix_topology Hi Falk we usually don't process the .5mm data directly. Instead we "conform" it to 1mm iso, recon it, then run mris_make_surfaces posthoc directly on

Re: [Freesurfer] Speeding up mris_fix_topology

2013-01-16 Thread Falk Lüsebrink
; > CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Betreff: Re: [Freesurfer] Speeding up mris_fix_topology > Hi Falk > > we usually don't process the .5mm data directly. Instead we "conform" it > to > 1mm iso, recon it, then run mris_make_surfaces posthoc directly on the >

Re: [Freesurfer] Speeding up mris_fix_topology

2013-01-16 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Falk we usually don't process the .5mm data directly. Instead we "conform" it to 1mm iso, recon it, then run mris_make_surfaces posthoc directly on the .5mm data to nudge the surfaces around to agree with it. Parallelizing mris_fix_topology is certainly possible if only we had an extra en

[Freesurfer] Speeding up mris_fix_topology

2013-01-16 Thread Falk Lüsebrink
Hello all, I'm processing some high resolution data with an isotropic resolution of 0.5mm and I was wondering if it would be possible to speed up mris_fix_topology somehow. Due to the increased number of vertices and also increased number of defects this stage takes incredibly long (e.g. lots o