Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation misses sulci in posterior

2013-12-07 Thread Eve M. LoCastro
E. 71st St S118 > Tel: 212-746-1289 > Fax: 212-746-4189 > http://ideal-cornell.com/ > > > From: Bruce Fischl [fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 4:28 PM > To: Eve M. LoCastro > Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.e

Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation misses sulci in posterior

2013-12-06 Thread Bruce Fischl
Tel: 212-746-1289 > Fax: 212-746-4189 > http://ideal-cornell.com/ > > > From: Bruce Fischl [fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 4:28 PM > To: Eve M. LoCastro > Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Segment

Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation misses sulci in posterior

2013-12-06 Thread Eve M. LoCastro
To: Eve M. LoCastro Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation misses sulci in posterior Hi Eve if you upload the subject we will take a look Bruce On Fri, 6 Dec 2013, Eve M. LoCastro wrote: > We have a T1 image that has been problematic to process. This pati

Re: [Freesurfer] Segmentation misses sulci in posterior

2013-12-06 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Eve if you upload the subject we will take a look Bruce On Fri, 6 Dec 2013, Eve M. LoCastro wrote: We have a T1 image that has been problematic to process. This patient has thicker skull and extensive hypointensities in the white matter along with big vents. Skullstripping by modifying th

[Freesurfer] Segmentation misses sulci in posterior

2013-12-06 Thread Eve M. LoCastro
We have a T1 image that has been problematic to process. This patient has thicker skull and extensive hypointensities in the white matter along with big vents. Skullstripping by modifying the watershed parameter either leaves too much skull or removes entire chunks of the brain in this Siemens