It works! Thank you, Doug.
Ting
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Douglas N Greve
> wrote:
>
> Would mris_decimate work?
>
>> On 11/24/2014 01:53 AM, 婷 wrote:
>> Thanks for your reply with detailed explanation. I am interested in what if
>> we apply analysis on native surface first. Still wond
Would mris_decimate work?
On 11/24/2014 01:53 AM, 婷 wrote:
> Thanks for your reply with detailed explanation. I am interested in what if
> we apply analysis on native surface first. Still wondering:)
>
> Ting
>
>
>> On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Thomas Yeo wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ting,
>>
>> What I usual
Thanks for your reply with detailed explanation. I am interested in what if we
apply analysis on native surface first. Still wondering:)
Ting
> On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Thomas Yeo wrote:
>
> Hi Ting,
>
> What I usually do is to project my functional data to fsaverage space
> and then sm
Hi Ting,
What I usually do is to project my functional data to fsaverage space
and then smooth and downsample to whatever resolution I want. There
are different fsaverage resolution meshes, like fsaverage5 (~20k
vertices) and fsaverage6 (~80k vertices). This can be achieved using
standard freesurf
Hi Thomas,
I want to analyze the data in native surface space. The functional volume
data could be register to native surface with bbregister, however, the
resolution of the native surface is quite high, too much nodes for
computational capacity to me. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Ting
On Fri, Nov 21, 2
Hi Ting,
I am not an expert, but why do you want to downsample the native
surface mesh? The usual way of doing this is to register the full
surface mesh with the functional volume data using Doug's bbregister.
Cheers,
Thomas
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 4:08 AM, ting xu wrote:
> Dear freesurfer expe
Dear freesurfer experts,
Is there any way to down resample the native surface mesh and register the
functional volume data to the down resampled surface in freesurfer?
Many thanks,
Ting
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https:/
