Why? YOu could reprocess all the data with 5.3 (which has a *much* better
longitudinal stream than 5.1)
On Wed, 23 Dec 2015, Jaiashre Sridhar wrote:
Dr. Fischl,
Since it is a longitudinal study, we have to stick to using 5.1 version.
Thanks,
Jaiashre.
__
Dr. Fischl,
Since it is a longitudinal study, we have to stick to using 5.1 version.
Thanks,
Jaiashre.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e
I see. That's quite old, which I think is why you are having this
problem. I'm not sure if it was fixed in 5.3 or not, but definitely not in
5.1. Can you try 5.3?
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Jaiashre Sridhar wrote:
Dr. Fischl,
I am using FS version 5.1.0
Thanks,
Jaiashre.
_
Dr. Fischl,
I am using FS version 5.1.0
Thanks,
Jaiashre.
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to who
Hi Jaiashre
hmmm, that looks like something we fixed a while ago. What version are
you running?
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Jaiashre Sridhar wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to manually edit and fix an error that is occurring in the
longitudinal time point of a subject. The error is on the ri
