Sebastian Moeller wrote:
Hi Doug,
On 11. Jul 2006, at 19:56 Uhr, Doug Greve wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
those are scaled to a global mean of 1000 (so you can think of them
as tenths of percents) -- but it's global, not local.
So (I am a bit dense, sorry for that), I could just use those
Hi Doug,
On 11. Jul 2006, at 19:56 Uhr, Doug Greve wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
those are scaled to a global mean of 1000 (so you can think of them as
tenths of percents) -- but it's global, not local.
So (I am a bit dense, sorry for that), I could just use those values
as basis to directly (multi
The h volume is a little nasty (blame Anders:). If you want the stddev
of the residual error, there should be a rstd.mgh file there. If you
want to know about the h volume, read on.
doug
selxavg-sess creates a directory called bold/analysis in which several
volumes will be stored. One of the
Hi Sebastian,
those are scaled to a global mean of 1000 (so you can think of them as
tenths of percents) -- but it's global, not local. Yes, you can divide
the h volume by the h-offset to give you local percent signal change.
This makes me a little uncomfortable because you can get some funny
Hi Doug,
a related question, why do the h volumes show differing values for
voxels at the odd "time points", supposedly the residual variance per
condition, while fast_ldsxabfile only returns one value per voxel for
the residual error variance? My expectation is to just have a single
eresvar
