Re: [Freesurfer] Question about running recon-all with deface

2015-12-15 Thread Bruce Fischl
urfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 10:05 AM To: Freesurfer support list Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Question about running recon-all with deface Hi Virenda can you say what you mean by 20% errors? Compar

Re: [Freesurfer] Question about running recon-all with deface

2015-12-15 Thread Mishra, Virendra
...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 10:05 AM To: Freesurfer support list Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Question about running recon-all with deface Hi Virenda can you say what you mean by 20% errors? Compared to what? Note for example that a 20% variation

Re: [Freesurfer] Question about running recon-all with deface

2015-12-14 Thread Bruce Fischl
Hi Virenda can you say what you mean by 20% errors? Compared to what? Note for example that a 20% variation in the thickness at one spot would mean a change of 0.4mm (for 2mm thick cortex). Seeing this type of variation point-wise somewhere in the brain isn't terribly surprising, although I w

[Freesurfer] Question about running recon-all with deface

2015-12-14 Thread Mishra, Virendra
Hi, I will appreciate if somebody could reply to my message that was posted earlier. I copy-paste the message here again. We are currently in the process of analyzing some data that was defaced using mri_deface command of freesurfer. This defaced data was then used as an input to recon-all and

[Freesurfer] Question about running recon-all with deface

2015-12-10 Thread Mishra, Virendra
Hello, We are currently in the process of analyzing some data that was defaced using mri_deface command of freesurfer. This defaced data was then used as an input to recon-all and the volume and thickness was computed. These results were then compared against the same subject's recon-all with t