Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses

2009-01-12 Thread Douglas N Greve
...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] *Sent:* Mon 1/12/2009 4:03 PM *To:* Xie, Hong *Cc:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses why not a continuous model? what model do you want to use? Xie, Hong wrote: > Thanks a lot. This scrip seemly describes F-test or T-t

RE: [Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses

2009-01-12 Thread Xie, Hong
have statistic method choice? Sorry, too many questions. Thanks. Hong Xie From: Douglas N Greve [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Sent: Mon 1/12/2009 4:03 PM To: Xie, Hong Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses

Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses

2009-01-12 Thread Douglas N Greve
g Xie *From:* Douglas N Greve [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] *Sent:* Mon 1/12/2009 3:11 PM *To:* Xie, Hong *Cc:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses Not with QDEC, but you can write your own FSGD, See https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvar

RE: [Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses

2009-01-12 Thread Xie, Hong
g Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses Not with QDEC, but you can write your own FSGD, See https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsgdExamples Xie, Hong wrote: > Hello, > Thank you for answering me. I searched mailing list and read th

Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses

2009-01-12 Thread Douglas N Greve
*From:* Douglas N Greve [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] *Sent:* Thu 1/8/2009 4:40 PM *To:* Xie, Hong *Cc:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses It has to be interpreted as a continuous variable

RE: [Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses

2009-01-12 Thread Xie, Hong
@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses It has to be interpreted as a continuous variable. The test is done using a t-test inside the glm. This reduces to a Pearson if there is only one variable and no intercept (which it is not). doug Xie, Hong wrote: > >

Re: [Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses

2009-01-08 Thread Douglas N Greve
It has to be interpreted as a continuous variable. The test is done using a t-test inside the glm. This reduces to a Pearson if there is only one variable and no intercept (which it is not). doug Xie, Hong wrote: Hello, freesurfer group, I have run qdec for comparing thickness betwee

[Freesurfer] Qdec correlation analyses

2009-01-08 Thread Xie, Hong
Hello, freesurfer group, I have run qdec for comparing thickness between two groups. When qdec does a correlation analyses for thickness versus a second variable: 1) Does the second variable have to be a continuous interval variable or 2) can the second variable be an ordinal variable with mor