Sorry, I made a typo. Here's how it should have read:
> > I changed the list from
> >
> > SUBJECTS='a36 A59 f10 f18 f20';
> > ONE_SUBJECT='a36'
> >
> > to
> >
> > SUBJECTS='A59 f10 f18 f20 a36';
> > ONE_SUBJECT='A59';
> > GCAupdateNodeCovariance(15, 35, 23, 0): could not find label.
(Does th
sorry, not sure I understand. If you put the subject that causes the
failure first in the list does it still cause the failure?
On Wed, 10 Dec
2008, Jason S. Minamora wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I changed the list from
SUBJECTS='a36 A59 f10 f18 f20';
ONE_SUBJECT='a36'
to
SUBJECTS='a36 A59 f10
Hi Bruce,
I changed the list from
SUBJECTS='a36 A59 f10 f18 f20';
ONE_SUBJECT='a36'
to
SUBJECTS='a36 A59 f10 f18 f20';
ONE_SUBJECT='a36';
and got the same output, except for the line
GCAupdateNodeCovariance(15, 35, 23, 0): could not find label.
Using
SUBJECTS='A59 f10 f18 f20 a36';
if you change the order of subjects in your list to mri_ca_train does it
change anyything? What version are you using?
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Jason S.
Minamora wrote:
Hello,
I asked about this issue about a month ago, but haven't gotten a
response. I'm trying to build a new GCA using th
Hello,
I asked about this issue about a month ago, but haven't gotten a
response. I'm trying to build a new GCA using the rebuild_gca_atlas.csh
script, with checking disabled (no `-check' flag). My subjects are
completely acallosal, and each of the edited segmentation volumes
that the scri
