OK, so the alignment is to perform a simple average? that way, the real goal of
the method is the registration before averaging, am I right?
in versions like 4.05 what was the alignmen method, was the flirt? Do you know
if Martin's robust registration is now implemented or will come in the next
yes, the first image is the template. I think it uses flirt. Recent
versions may use Martin's robust registration.
doug
Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Gabriel,
>
> I'm not sure I know what you mean. I think we use flirt to compute the
> motion parameters, then we just average the images in the aligne
Hi Gabriel,
I'm not sure I know what you mean. I think we use flirt to compute the
motion parameters, then we just average the images in the aligned space
(which I think is to the first scan specified, but Doug would know)
cheers
Bruce
On Thu,
1 Jul 2010, Gabriel Go.Es. wrote:
Thank you
Thank you Bruce for you answer, but i still have the doubt, is motion
correction from the FSL the method to average the images? or is another
method... I wrote motion correction cuz in the -help of recon-all says that
theyr made in the same step, but not to be the same process. but whatever is
Hi Gabriel,
I'm pretty sure we use FSL's flirt for motion correction by default, but
Nick or Doug can confirm.
cheers
Bruce
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Gabriel Go.Es. wrote:
Hello freesurfers
Does anyone knows wich is the method in which the FS makes an average of 2
images, in the autorecon1 st
Hello freesurfers
Does anyone knows wich is the method in which the FS makes an average of 2
images, in the autorecon1 step when doing the motion correction?. I mean how
can I explain it?
Thanx
Gabriel
__
