On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 11:29 -0300, Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira
Junior wrote:
> That's without GPU?
Yes. CPU only stream.
Richard
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesur
That's without GPU?
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:17, Richard G. Edgar
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 08:27 -0500, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> > If you have enough memory! Maybe Richard can post current CPU recon
> > times with the latest hardware and optimizations. I think they are
> > much shorter th
On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 08:27 -0500, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> If you have enough memory! Maybe Richard can post current CPU recon
> times with the latest hardware and optimizations. I think they are
> much shorter than they used to be
My workstation (3.2 GHz Nehalem) can do a recon-all ernie in about
If you have enough memory! Maybe Richard can post current CPU recon times with
the latest hardware and optimizations. I think they are much shorter than they
used to be
On Mar 10, 2011, at 3:28 AM, Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira
Junior wrote:
> You can run 12 recon-all in parallel.
>
> Y
You can run 12 recon-all in parallel.
You'll have 12 patients processed in each day approximately
-
Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior
Diretor de Operações
Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom
-- www.netfilter.com.br
-- For mobile
Hi,all:
As we have too many controls and patients to run the "recon-all",and it
is really time-suming,so,how can I reduce the time of recon-all in a group of
patients?
After read the statistic info on the website
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/ReconAllRunTimes
It seems the mac
