Re: [Freesurfer] Longitudinal Freesurfer in the presence of large tissue defects

2024-03-04 Thread Philip P
bruary 28, 2024 20:41 > To: Hoffmann, Malte,PhD > Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Longitudinal Freesurfer in the presence of large > tissue defects > >External Email - Use Caution > > Hi Malte, > &

Re: [Freesurfer] Longitudinal Freesurfer in the presence of large tissue defects

2024-02-29 Thread Hoffmann, Malte,PhD
: Hoffmann, Malte,PhD Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Longitudinal Freesurfer in the presence of large tissue defects External Email - Use Caution Hi Malte, Thanks for the response, it’s encouraging to hear you think the longitudinal pipeline will still

Re: [Freesurfer] Longitudinal Freesurfer in the presence of large tissue defects

2024-02-28 Thread Philip P
here, but this won’t > necessarily make for a good template. > > Malte > > > From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > on behalf of Philip P > > Sent: Sunday, February 4, 2024 01:48 > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harva

Re: [Freesurfer] Longitudinal Freesurfer in the presence of large tissue defects

2024-02-26 Thread Hoffmann, Malte,PhD
presence of large tissue defects External Email - Use Caution Dear Freesurfer Developers, I am currently running the Longitudinal Pipeline on a cohort with significant portions of brain tissue removed. The obtained base templates overall look reasonable, however, when overlaying the

[Freesurfer] Longitudinal Freesurfer in the presence of large tissue defects

2024-02-03 Thread Philip P
External Email - Use Caution Dear Freesurfer Developers, I am currently running the Longitudinal Pipeline on a cohort with significant portions of brain tissue removed. The obtained base templates overall look reasonable, however, when overlaying the transformed session T1ws an