Hi Bruce and Sita,
Do you have any suggestions after seeing the modified and original data?
Thanks a lot,
Gergo
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information
Hi Sita and Bruce,
Sorry for this, it's the first time I post files here and I wasn't aware of
the possibility you mentioned. Humyo sometimes acts like
an idiot, but usually works (I make the files public and gave you direct
links), sorry for that also.
I've uploaded the data to the incoming direc
Hi Bruce,
Please follow these links to get the dataset:
http://www.humyo.com/7891739/C1_orig.tar.gz
http://www.humyo.com/7891739/C1_modified.tar.gz
The first one is the original before placing the control points, the second
is the modified dataset after correction.
Thanks a lot, and sorry for
Hi Gabor,
recon2-cp currently starts *after* the aseg, so you'll need to rerun it
from an ealier point than that. Try using -autorecon2 instead.
cheers
Bruce
On Wed, 3 Mar
2010, Perlaki Gabor wrote:
Hi all!
We overlayed the aseg.mgz on the norm.mgz and put some controll points where
the c
Hi all!
We overlayed the aseg.mgz on the norm.mgz and put some controll points where
the cerebellum segmentation was not accurate and we saved the controll points.
We reran recon-all like this: 'recon-all -autorecon2-cp -autorecon3 -subjid
our_subj'
After that we checked the volume of cerebellum,
Hi Gergely,
overlay the aseg.mgz on the norm.mgz in tkmedit and you can visually verify
if it's accurate. If not, you can edit it with the tools in tkmedit. We do
have some internal tools for VBM-style analysis but rarely use them as the
results are so ambiguous. It should be easy enough to stu
Hi all!
We have processed 100 subjects with autorecon.
I'd like to know how to check the cerebellum segmentation on the
subjects. It would be crucial, because the images are a bit dimmer at the
lower areas (it's far from the isocenter) and despite the intensity
normalisation it still has lower int
