You can do that, but you'll need to change the paradigm file to reflect
the new timing.
doug
On 04/10/2013 01:57 PM, preci...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu wrote:
> If anything I was thinking of removing the first two time points, as those
> are going to get nixed anyway. I was hoping it wouldn't come to th
If anything I was thinking of removing the first two time points, as those
are going to get nixed anyway. I was hoping it wouldn't come to that but i
f that's the only way...
-Ronny
> Hi Ronny, the time point used to as the template is hard-coded to be the
> middle time point. If this is just the
Hi Ronny, the time point used to as the template is hard-coded to be the
middle time point. If this is just the case for one subject, a silly but
simple solution is to remove the last two time points from the time
series. This will cause the "middle" time point to shift to an earlier
time point
One of my subjects exhibited motion during the middle time point of one
the functional scans. FS-FAST then reads all other time points as having a
significant amount of motion because the subject was out of place during
the point that is marked as the origin. Is there some way that I can set a
diff
