Re: [Freesurfer] FOV in freesurfer

2007-05-01 Thread Bruce Fischl
yes, it is zero padded. Note also that it is downsampled to be 8 bits/voxel from whatever it was. On Tue, 1 May 2007, Trina Kok wrote: Hi, The voxel dimensions are indeed 1x1x1. Does embedding mean that the 256x256 matrix is form from zero-padding? Thanks! Trina Quoting Bruce Fischl <[EMAIL

Re: [Freesurfer] FOV in freesurfer

2007-05-01 Thread Trina Kok
Hi, The voxel dimensions are indeed 1x1x1. Does embedding mean that the 256x256 matrix is form from zero-padding? Thanks! Trina Quoting Bruce Fischl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: it depends on the voxel dimensions. If they are 1x1x1 we just embed it, otherwise we use trilinear interpolation. cheers,

Re: [Freesurfer] FOV in freesurfer

2007-05-01 Thread Bruce Fischl
it depends on the voxel dimensions. If they are 1x1x1 we just embed it, otherwise we use trilinear interpolation. cheers, Bruce On Tue, 1 May 2007, Trina Kok wrote: Hi All, I have a few scans that were done with a field of view of 200. I was wondering how freesurfer extrapolates that to a

[Freesurfer] FOV in freesurfer

2007-05-01 Thread Trina Kok
Hi All, I have a few scans that were done with a field of view of 200. I was wondering how freesurfer extrapolates that to a 256 by 256 by 256 matrix. Thanks, Trina ___ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harva