Re: [Freesurfer] FDR versus mri_glmfit-sim with --cache option

2012-07-18 Thread Antonella Kis
From: Douglas N Greve To: Antonella Kis ; "Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 12:03 PM Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] FDR versus mri_glmfit-sim with --cache option It should be the sig.mgh file in your contrast directory. doug ps. Please post to th

Re: [Freesurfer] FDR versus mri_glmfit-sim with --cache option

2012-07-18 Thread Douglas N Greve
> *From:* Douglas N Greve > *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:39 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] FDR versus mri_glmfit-sim with --cache option > > Hi Antonella, first of all, FDR and clusterwise correction are doing > diff

Re: [Freesurfer] FDR versus mri_glmfit-sim with --cache option

2012-07-18 Thread Antonella Kis
Hi Doug, Many thanks for your prompt response and your help. I have one more question please. I searched for mri_surfcluster command and I am not sure what should be my input file. Can you please clarify this for me? Should this beĀ  L-frontal.fsgd since I have more subjects? Thank you. Antonel

Re: [Freesurfer] FDR versus mri_glmfit-sim with --cache option

2012-07-18 Thread Douglas N Greve
Hi Antonella, first of all, FDR and clusterwise correction are doing different things. Technically, you don't get clusters from FDR. FDR will choose a voxel-wise threshold for you, and any voxel above threshold can be interpreted as surviving FDR (but you should know how to interpret it -- see

[Freesurfer] FDR versus mri_glmfit-sim with --cache option

2012-07-18 Thread Antonella Kis
Dear FS team, I am doing a cortical thickness study using QDEC. I used FDR and got the following clusters: Generating cluster stats using min threshold of 3.8... Found 2 clusters Contrast: 'lh-Diff-Class1-Class2-Intercept-thickness', 15fwhm, DOF: 69 ClusterNo Max VtxMax Size(mm2) TalX