liano
From: alessia_giuli...@hotmail.it
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 06:46:29 +
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Corpus Callosum segmentation reliability
Dear Bruce,
the two subject dirs are here
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/k1z5o0e6sq90qq0/AABx38QxKvxDhUe2lV9imaa9a.
The ori
Dear Bruce,
did you see the images that I have sent you?
Thanks,
Alessia Giuliano
From: alessia_giuli...@hotmail.it
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2014 06:46:29 +
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Corpus Callosum segmentation reliability
Dear Bruce,
the two subject dirs are
: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Corpus Callosum segmentation reliability
hmmm, that is puzzling. Can you upload the two subject dirs with the
rotated direction cosines and I'll take a look?
thanks
Bruce
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014, Alessia
Giuliano wrote:
> Dear Bruce,
lessia Giuliano
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 08:30:10 -0400
From: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Corpus Callosum segmentation reliability
Hi Alessia
when you say "the image was rotated" do you mean you actually transformed
the image,
to improve the CC segmentation in order to consider
the volumes of its subregions to be reliable?
Thank you,
Alessia Giuliano
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 08:30:10 -0400
From: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Corpus Callosum segmentation reliability
H
Hi Alessia
when you say "the image was rotated" do you mean you actually transformed
the image, or you simply changed the image header to reflect a new
orientation? I wouldn't think the latter would have a big effect, but the
former will involve an additional image interpolation (blurring) a
