Re: [Freesurfer] Choosing projfrac/projdist and checking mri_vol2surf output

2021-05-31 Thread Douglas N. Greve
ect template of freesurfer. Thanks, Marianna *From:* freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Douglas N. Greve *Sent:* 27 May 2021 9:39 PM *To:* freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu *Subject:* Re: [Freesurfer] Choosing pr

Re: [Freesurfer] Choosing projfrac/projdist and checking mri_vol2surf output

2021-05-28 Thread M Pope
re in line with the bert subject template of freesurfer. Thanks, Marianna From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu on behalf of Douglas N. Greve Sent: 27 May 2021 9:39 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Choosing projfrac/projdi

Re: [Freesurfer] Choosing projfrac/projdist and checking mri_vol2surf output

2021-05-27 Thread Douglas N. Greve
If I understand you correctly, you have an ROI defined in the volume and you want to transfer it to the surface. Is that right? First you should look at the ROI in the volume along with the surfaces and make sure that they pass through the ROI. I would generally use the projfrac-max option for

[Freesurfer] Choosing projfrac/projdist and checking mri_vol2surf output

2021-05-21 Thread M Pope
External Email - Use Caution Hi all, I have a question regarding checking the output of mri_vol2surf. I am converting a manually segmented volume ROI into a surface label in order to gain information such as cortical thickness. What is the best practice for quality control and c