I definitely meant to type *Dear in my email.
Cheers,
Maryam
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Syeda Wajiha Maryam
wrote:
> Fear Freesurfer Experts,
>
> I have a feeling this question has been asked already but I'm still
> confused about it. Is there a way to extract the basal ganglia structure
sure, we segment putamen, pallidum and caudate as part of the aseg.mgz
(and nucleus accumbens, although that is less well-defined)
On Thu, 11 Feb
2016, Syeda Wajiha Maryam wrote:
> Fear Freesurfer Experts,
>
> I have a feeling this question has been asked already but I'm still confused
> about
Fear Freesurfer Experts,
I have a feeling this question has been asked already but I'm still
confused about it. Is there a way to extract the basal ganglia structure
using freesurfer?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Regards,
Maryam
___
Freesurfer mail
Hi Paul,
yes, we know this happens - it's because of the way the manual training
set was constructed, so that it has voxels labeled cortex there that
shouldn't exist. The accumbens in general isn't all that accurate as it has
no real intensity signatures at its boundaries, so we don't use it a
p.s. sorry, I should have looked at the images first. Everything I said
still applies, but this looks worse than it should. If you put it one our
filedrop I'll take a look
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Paul Greenberg wrote:
Hello,
I'm having trouble getting an accurate subcortical segmentation (aseg.m
