External Email - Use Caution
Can it be inferred that "at the cluster there exist significant changes to
cortical thickness due to the interactions of DEVxSEXxDIA"
would that be a better wording ?
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 2:57 PM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <
dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wro
I'm not sure I would refer to an interaction as a "decrease" per se
On 11/26/2018 02:44 PM, Azeez, Azeezat wrote:
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Thank You for the response.
> I'm trying to understand a result I have,
> The interaction effect of DEVxSEXxDIA shows decrease in cortica
External Email - Use Caution
Thank You for the response.
I'm trying to understand a result I have,
The interaction effect of DEVxSEXxDIA shows decrease in cortical
thickness at a specific cluster.
Can this be interpreted to be "the localized cortical thickness decrease
seen at
Use csdbase.y.ocn.dat
See
mri_glmfit-sim --help
for more info
On 11/24/2018 09:31 PM, Azeez, Azeezat wrote:
>
> External Email - Use Caution
>
> Hello,
>
> I used FSGD option to run statistical test on 3 fixed factors each
> with 2 contrast levels. (DEVELOPMENT : old vs young, SEX: male
External Email - Use Caution
Hello,
I used FSGD option to run statistical test on 3 fixed factors each with 2
contrast levels. (DEVELOPMENT : old vs young, SEX: male vs female,
DIAGNOSE: Control Vs disease )
I report significant interaction effects of DEVxSEXxDIA at a spefic clu