In that post, I'm not saying that we have a meninges segmentation, just
that the meninges might be removed when doing skull stripping. This will
not remove the signal from meninges that has partial-volumed into the
brain. We don't have a way to do that unless there is a meningeal ROI.
On 1/30/
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Doug,
We are working on PET images and our tracer has a lot of non-specific binding
close to meninges. To do so we want to be able to mask out meninges and other
areas outside the brain. Following up on your suggestion as in
https://secure-web.
Dear Daniel,
For the "outer" boundary of your ROI, I would try the betsurf from FSL for the
inner skull surface estimation. This should be more precise than using
brainmask.mgz.
https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/BET/UserGuide
Antonin
You could remove the brain (as found in aseg.mgz) from
You could remove the brain (as found in aseg.mgz) from the
brainmask.mgz. This will leave some dura. It is not an elegant or
accurate solution
On 03/06/2017 02:24 PM, Albrecht, Daniel S. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a PET dataset where we expect to see pathogenic changes in the
> meninges. We'd
Hello,
We have a PET dataset where we expect to see pathogenic changes in the
meninges. We'd like to extract the meningeal signal in subject space, and were
hoping to come up with an automated strategy to create meningeal ROIs,
containing no brain or scalp.
So my question is: can you suggest an
