Hey Bruce,
I'll use the average of the two. Thanks.
-Morgan
Bruce Fischl wrote:
hmmm, I wrote something a while ago to generate a middle surface, but
I'm not sure I would recommend it. It's kind of strange to be
measuring the area of a surface that doesn't exist, isn't it? I would
rather use
hmmm, I wrote something a while ago to generate a middle surface, but I'm
not sure I would recommend it. It's kind of strange to be measuring the
area of a surface that doesn't exist, isn't it? I would rather use the
average of the two
Bruce
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Morgan
Hough wrote:
Thank
Thanks Bruce,
These will give quite different values, right? Any chance of getting at
the mid-thickness area?
Cheers,
-Morgan
Bruce Fischl wrote:
Hi Morgan,
you get to choose. I think the default ?h.area file uses the ?h.white
surface, but you can give mris_anatomical_stats whatever surfa
Hi Morgan,
you get to choose. I think the default ?h.area file uses the ?h.white
surface, but you can give mris_anatomical_stats whatever surface you
want. I think we also by default compute an ?h.pial.area file.
Bruce
On Thu, 24
May 2007, Morgan Hough wrote:
I just wanted to check which s
I just wanted to check which surface was used to compute area and which
reference would have this information. Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
-Morgan
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listi
