me intracranial volume includes
>>> everything, even non-cortical regions? If that is so, is
>>> BrainSegVol
>>> a measure of total cortical volume? I also noticed that the
>>> values in
>>> BrainSegVol differ greatly between the two stats files. Y
Vol differ greatly between the two stats files. Your help
is
greatly appreciated,
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Wed 3/11/2009 12:47 PM
To: Dankner, Nathan (NIH/NIMH) [F]
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Aparcs
in
> > BrainSegVol differ greatly between the two stats files. Your help is
> > greatly appreciated,
> >
> >>
> >> Nathan
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
>
p is
greatly appreciated,
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Fischl [mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Wed 3/11/2009 12:47 PM
To: Dankner, Nathan (NIH/NIMH) [F]
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Aparcstats question
Hi Nathan,
the "unknown" l
athan (NIH/NIMH) [F]
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Aparcstats question
Hi Nathan,
the "unknown" label is intended to be non-cortical regions such as the
callosum, and should be ignord. I think total white matter volume is
generated by default, but maybe N
...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: Wed 3/11/2009 12:47 PM
To: Dankner, Nathan (NIH/NIMH) [F]
Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Aparcstats question
Hi Nathan,
the "unknown" label is intended to be non-cortical regions such as the
callosum, and should be ignord. I think t
Hi Nathan,
the "unknown" label is intended to be non-cortical regions such as the
callosum, and should be ignord. I think total white matter volume is
generated by default, but maybe Nick or Doug can correct me (although Nick
is out of the country)
Bruce
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Dankner, Nath
Hello all, I sent this a couple of weeks ago but it must have slipped through
the cracks:
I have a couple of questions regarding the stats files. First, at the
beginning of the aparc.stats tables, there is a measure that is labeled
³unknown.² Is this total average thickness throughout the cort
I have a couple of questions regarding the stats files. First, at the
beginning of the aparc.stats tables, there is a measure that is labeled
³unknown.² Is this total average thickness throughout the cortex, or just
some throw-away measure?
Secondly, I have heard that there are command line flag
