h more quickly.
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, martijn van den heuvel
wrote:
> Hi bruce,
>
> Thanks for looking into my 'maximumnumber?' problem. Good to hear that
you
> have run in on 300+, at least I know it should be possible and there is
no
> fixed maximum number.
>
&
Hi Martijn,
it looks like we have a memory leak. We'll look into it and get back to
you. I'm surprised you don't get past 253 with 16G of ram though. I've
run it on 300 or so.
Bruce
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, martijn van den heuvel wrote:
> Dear Freesurfer-list,
>
> I&#
h 16 GB of system memory, and there is plenty
of free memory when it runs.
Is there a maximum set on the number of subjects you can use in
'make_average_subject'? Can I reset this value?
Yours sincerely,
Martijn van den Heuvel
__
relative to the orig.mgz. If you run
mri_info orig.mgz
you will see c_{ras} values. Try adding or subtracting these.
doug
martijn van den heuvel wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thanks for your reply. Indeed, I can open the surface in both programs,
but there seems to be a shift in a coordinate system. I w
rt COR. I'm at a disadvantage here in that I've not used
Neurolens before. I'm not even sure what the problem is. You can show
the surfaces in neurolens and in tksurfer, so what's the problem?
doug
martijn van den heuvel wrote:
Dear Bruce,
Thanks for your quick reply. I p
displays in an RAS coordinate system in which (0,0,0)>> is essentially the center of the volume, whereas Neurolens is probably
>> displaying scanner coordinates. Does it matter to you? Not sure I>> understand - is it causing you any problems?>>>> Bruce>>&
), or does it do a general shift to the RAS centre? Generally, Im looking for the translation matrix from RAS to world coordinates, so I can apply this translation to the surface before loading it in Neurolens.
I hope someone can help me with this question.Yours sincerely,Martijn van den Heuvel
