ver from wm.mgz inaccuracies
> in others ones though. You might try setting wlo to above the values of the
> gray matter that it is including (to be passed to mri_segment and
> mris_make_surfaces using -seg-wlo
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, elisa veronese
he surfaces won't recover from wm.mgz inaccuracies
> in others ones though. You might try setting wlo to above the values of the
> gray matter that it is including (to be passed to mri_segment and
> mris_make_surfaces using -seg-wlo
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
> On Thu,
Dear FreeSurfer users,
I have a question regarding the link between cortical thickness and
gyrification index: suppose I have a general decrease of cortical thickness
in a lobe of the brain.
Is it correct to suppose that consiquentely the gyrification index will
decrease in the sulci (because of t
the decreased
curvature) and that it will increase in the gyri (because of the increased
curvature)? So that probably I would not be able to measure any difference
in the gyrification index of that lobe?
Thank you.
Best,
elisa
--
Elisa Veronese - PhD
*Research Unit on Brain Imaging and
4-10-15 16:28 GMT+02:00 elisa veronese :
> Great, thank you Douglas, now it's not confusing :)
>
> Best,
> elisa
>
> 2014-10-15 16:26 GMT+02:00 Douglas Greve :
>
>>
>> It is a little confusing, but when you pass a map with -t lh.map, then
>> the values in
t the map is. When you then run aparcstats2table and specify "thickness"
> you get whatever is in the thickness column regardless of whether it is
> thickness or not.
>
>
>
> On 10/15/14 7:44 AM, elisa veronese wrote:
>
> Thank you Douglas, but I'm afraid I
s case).
>
> doug
>
>
> On 10/13/2014 07:49 AM, elisa veronese wrote:
> > Dear FreeSurfers,
> >
> > I'm facing a problem with the estimation of local gyrification index.
> > I've already performed the analysis with QDEC and the insertion of the
&
umbers stand for. I'm afraid they have nothing
to do with the gyrification index.
Thank you,
best
elisa
--
Elisa Veronese - PhD
*Research Unit on Brain Imaging and Neuropsychology (RUBIN)*
*Inter-University Center for Behavioral Neurosciences (ICBN)University of
Udine and University o
.
Best,
Elisa
--
Elisa Veronese - PhD
*Research Unit on Brain Imaging and Neuropsychology (RUBIN)*
*Inter-University Center for Behavioral Neurosciences (ICBN)University of
Udine and University of Verona, ItalyICBN
Website: http://icbn.uniud.it/tiki-index.php
<http://icbn.uniud.it/tiki-index.
values
obtained with the aparcstats2table?
- Computing a weighted average of the 3 cortical thickness values obtained
with the aparcstats2table? In this case, what would you use as weight? The
area of the 3 regions?
Thank you.
Best,
Elisa
--
Elisa Veronese - PhD
*Research Unit on Brain Imaging
how can I obtain the actual
gyrification index?
Thank you.
Best,
Elisa
--
Elisa Veronese - PhD
*Research Unit on Brain Imaging and Neuropsychology (RUBIN)*
*Inter-University Center for Behavioral Neurosciences (ICBN)University of
Udine and University of Verona, ItalyICBN
Website: http://icbn.uni
m: remove regular file `/tmp/tp1773697773286350.load_mgh.2127429.mgh'? y
2014-06-27 20:25 GMT+02:00 Douglas N Greve :
>
> #1. not a problem
> #2. yes, delete it
>
> doug
>
> On 06/27/2014 03:41 AM, elisa veronese wrote:
> > Dear FS users,
> >
> > I'm
Thank you.
Best,
Elisa
Il giorno 27/giu/2014 20:26, "Douglas N Greve"
ha scritto:
>
> #1. not a problem
> #2. yes, delete it
>
> doug
>
> On 06/27/2014 03:41 AM, elisa veronese wrote:
> > Dear FS users,
> >
> > I'm trying the -localGI on a
.0.783) 64-bit (glnxa64)
August 22, 2012
To get started, type one of these: helpwin, helpdesk, or demo.
For product information, visit www.mathworks.com.
>> reading filled volume...
rm: remove regular file `/tmp/tp726715349117711.load_mgh.8128471.mgh
Dear FreeSurfer users,
can anybody tell me if and how it is possible to manually correct an
uncorrect parcellation of the CC, i.e. if the rostrum is uncorrectly
assigned to the CC_Mid_Anterior label instead of the CC_Anterior label?
Thank you.
Best
Elisa
--
Elisa Veronese - PhD
*Research
rid is the
Freesurfer version *5.1.0 *Linux CentOS4 x86_64
When I perform the subsequent manual correction on my workstation, I use
Freesurfer version *5.3.0* Linux CentOS4 x86_64
Is this correct? Should I downgrade to the 5.1.0 version also in my
workstation?
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Elisa
Hi,
I am a beginner in the use of Freesurfer. I was wondering if the T1w volume
used as input for the recon-all has to be acquired in axial direction or
not. In other words, is there a recommended acquisition direction?
Thank you,
Elisa
--
Elisa Veronese - PhD
http://www.dei.unipd.it/~verones1
17 matches
Mail list logo