Re: [Freesurfer] different clusters in mri_surfcluster output versus viewing in Freeview

2023-02-26 Thread Smith, Christine
2/22/2023 8:59 PM, Smith, Christine wrote: External Email - Use Caution Hi Yujing, Thank you for explaining that. I believe that mri_surfcluster is the correct output, in that it is carrying out a one-sided test of significance at 2 (Sig = -log(pvalue), i.e., p < 0.01). For

Re: [Freesurfer] different clusters in mri_surfcluster output versus viewing in Freeview

2023-02-22 Thread Smith, Christine
i7miyEbAYhc-kerXLBeVJsEdOL47Z-BwyKRfHb1Azt_RymKoiIqg$> I think you can try to adjust these options to match freeview: --thmin <>, --thmax <>, --thsign <>, --minarea <>, --no-adjust. Best, Yujing From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu On Behalf Of Smith, Christine

[Freesurfer] different clusters in mri_surfcluster output versus viewing in Freeview

2023-02-21 Thread Smith, Christine
External Email - Use Caution Hello, I am getting a mismatch of clusters when we view cluster results in freeview versus ask for a table of the significant clusters. I am performing a GLM analysis on Freesurfer to analyze cortical thickness (mri_glmfit). When viewing the signifi