there further processing that would
affect the intensity distributions ?
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 11:02 AM Douglas N. Greve
wrote:
> I would recommend the norm.mgz as it should be scaled so that the WM is
> 110 and bias fields would have been (mostly) removed.
>
>
> On 11/12/2024 12:0
External Email - Use Caution
It seems the original posting did not go through likely because it had an
attachment. Here it is again.
I have seen some threads from a few years ago discussing differences in
thickness, and we see this in volume as well (v6). I had an attached plot
fo
External Email - Use Caution
We want to perform appearance-based analysis that also takes advantage of
automated outputs, especially segmentations. For this, we have considered
different options: raw image, orig.mgz, norm.mgz, T1.mgz, in addition to
whether to use base or long pipe
