ependent of these. I think the only issue are the
> spots in the aparc+aseg, which I think we've fixed. You should be able to
> just rerun the very last (Fast) steps to regenerate them.
>
> cheers,
> Bruce
>
>
>
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Ryan Scotton wrote:
>
> Hi
47 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: [Freesurfer] Incorrect correspondence in the
aparc+aseg.mgz volume?
To: Nick Schmansky
Cc: Ryan Scotton , Freesurfer Mailing List <
freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Hi Ryan,
I think a lot of the spottyness you are seeing is a bug in FS3 that was
fixed. Try using the new
I still don't quite understand what I'm looking at. Maybe you can put a
> problem subject somewhere we can get to it?
>
> cheers,
> Bruce
>
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Ryan Scotton wrote:
>
> For whatever reason, my email from this morning doesn&
Hi FreeSurfers,
After a months of QC'ing FreeSurfer results, my team and I are now working
toward end stage analysis of our cortical thickness data. All along, we
have been aiming to make improvements in the wm.mgz volume so that we can
assure that the white matter and gray matter surfaces are as
Hi Bruce,
My team has recently begun planning for data analysis after completing the
overwhelming majority of our FreeSurfer runs and manual edits. However, it
came to my attention that we do not currently have Qdec installed on our
system...I realized that this is because we were using a very ou
late image that has already
been parcellated appropriately in order to get the best idea of where each
label lies. Is this an option?
Ryan
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Doug Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> If you've reconned a subject, you can use the aparc+aseg.mgz volume.
&g
Hi Freesurfers,
Some associates of mine are working on a pipeline that generates cortical
parcellations and we are looking to compare its measurements to some
measurements generated by the freesurfer pipeline. However, our pipeline
parcellates broader regions which include several labels generate
Hi all,
I am fairly new to FreeSurfer and I've just finished initial runs on about
140 MRI
images. Now, my job is to go through and do a little QC that helps ensure
that the
cortical thickness values are as accurate as possible. Now, I have a few
questions:
1. Am I right in assuming that cort
