Re: [Freesurfer] Downsampling the surface

2015-11-12 Thread Razlighi, Qolamreza R.
Hi Doug, It's missing from Mac version of the built v5.3.0. I just checked the Linux version for the same built and it is there. Is the one you sent compiled for Mac? Also, I would really appreciate if you could kindly comment on my second question. Thanks a lot -- Ray Razlighi, Ph.D. Assistan

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_label2label

2015-11-10 Thread Razlighi, Qolamreza R.
] mri_label2label looks like it works. I don't think not hashing will have an effect (except to slow it down) On 11/10/2015 02:49 PM, Razlighi, Qolamreza R. wrote: > I always wondered what is the 5th column for? > Anyway seems to me it is working. I need to do more checking but this > is

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_label2label

2015-11-10 Thread Razlighi, Qolamreza R.
:39 PM, Douglas N Greve mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote: You can try adding a number in the statistic field (the 5th column) On 11/10/2015 02:24 PM, Razlighi, Qolamreza R. wrote: Thanks Doug, Now with —norevmap option gives 191 vertices. See below. I’m completely confused here

Re: [Freesurfer] mri_label2label

2015-11-10 Thread Razlighi, Qolamreza R.
Thanks Doug, Now with —norevmap option gives 191 vertices. See below. I’m completely confused here. I have 217 vertices that I want to map them into a another subject surface. I have no problem if multiple vertices are mapping into one vertex or one vertex in source surface maps onto multiple ver

Re: [Freesurfer] Surface-based registration

2015-11-04 Thread Razlighi, Qolamreza R.
ch inaccuracy are you referring to? > > cheers > Bruce > > On Wed, 4 Nov 2015, Razlighi, Qolamreza R. wrote: > >> Dear Bruce, >> I did run it again with option (-dist 0.25); however the result did not >> change much (See the attachment). These results do not see

Re: [Freesurfer] Differences in the asc and FreeSurfer format of the surface data

2015-11-03 Thread Razlighi, Qolamreza R.
: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/qnl/ On Nov 3, 2015, at 9:59 AM, Bruce Fischl mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote: Hi Ray I would assume that they are in "tkras" space, which is still "native" but is not voxel coords. cheers Bruce On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, Razlighi, Qolamreza

Re: [Freesurfer] Differences in the asc and FreeSurfer format of the surface data

2015-11-03 Thread Razlighi, Qolamreza R.
Bruce Fischl mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote: Hi Ray the ascii format is pretty barebones and doesn't have e.g. ras2vox info that freeview uses to display the surfaces properly. It's for ease of conversion and such. cheers Bruce On Mon, 2 Nov 2015, Razlighi, Qolamr