Ok, that's great. Thanks very much for your help.
Best wishes and Merry Christmas!
Qi Zhu, PostDoc
Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie
K.U.Leuven Medical School
Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven (Belgium)
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Douglas N Greve
wrote:
> Yes that is corre
is calculated from the p
value that came from the Ftest. So the t value is calculated wrong in
fs 5.0.
I am now changing this line to:
Fvol = fast_mat2vol(Fmat,mri.volsize);
t.vol = sqrt(Fvol).*sign(ces.vol);
Is this correct?
Best,
Qi Zhu, PostDoc
Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie
e F values. Is that correct?
Best,
Qi Zhu, PostDoc
Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie
K.U.Leuven Medical School
Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven (Belgium)
phone +32 16 33 02 09
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Douglas N Greve
wrote:
> I think this is due to the high DOF and probably
data defined ROI to get those values? And how to average
the gammavar values in a ROI? Just mean(gammavar), or
sqrt(mean(gammavar^2))?
Thanks very much for the answers.
regards,
Qi Zhu
Laboratorium voor Neuro- en Psychofysiologie
K.U.Leuven Medical School