Hi,
I had 2 questions relating to measuring global mean cortical thickness with
the weighting factor of surface area
bh.thickness = ( (lh.thickness * lh.surfarea) + (rh.thickness *
rh.surfarea) ) / (lh.surfarea + rh.surfarea)
1.) If this weighting is recommended, then shouldn't it be performed f
misunderstanding something
Could this info be extracted with converting a surface (e.g., inflated)
with mris_convert? If so, where can I find info on how to read the ascii
surface files.
In other words, what I'm trying to do is for each vertex:
Best,
Mike
--
Michael Kranz
Graduate Res
Thanks!! These options do the trick
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Michael Kranz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to create a subject specific overlay with an intensity
> value of 1 (or another constant value across the entire cortical mantle)?
> (I'm thinking a command
Hi,
Is there a way to create a subject specific overlay with an intensity value
of 1 (or another constant value across the entire cortical mantle)? (I'm
thinking a command like fslmaths in FSL but on the surface for each vertex).
Best,
Mike
--
Michael Kranz
Graduate Research Assi
given
the outputs from mri_glmfit, it seems like it would be possible with
Freesurfer.
Best,
Mike
--
Michael Kranz
Graduate Research Assistant | Beckman Institute University of Illinois
314-323-1329
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer
Hi guys,
I want to overlay an ROI mask created in FSL in the MNI152 2mm volume space
(from a metaanalysis) with the aparc labels in Freesurfer to compare the
two ROI schemes (so I can have justification for picking some of the
Freesurfer ROIs for analyses).
I'm thinking of running the MNI152 2mm
Hi,
I have two groups and two time points (pre and post). I want to investigate
group*time interactions in an fMRI task taken at both time points.
I have run all the subjects through first level FEAT analyses in FSL as
well as the longitudinal Freesurfer pipeline.
I'm thinking of registering the
Hi,
I'm having trouble figuring out following problem:
For one subject (out of 200), I get the following error (this error only
persists for the right hemisphere-- left hemisphere works fine for this
subject).
mris_label_calc intersect
/SUBJECTS_DIR/sub2.long.subt/label/rh.cortex.label
/SUBJECTS
better to use longitudinally processed stats (as opposed to the cross
sectional stats)?
I ask because I'm not aware of any publications that do this...
Thanks much,
Mike Kranz
Michael Kranz
Graduate Research Assistant | Beckman Institute University of Illinois
314-323
Hi all,
I was wondering how I could go about getting anatomical stats for the
different regions from the Choi2012 and Buckner 2011 parcellations.
The Yeo 2011 cortical parcellation files were available in the fsaverage
folders and I could get stats and labels for those, but I couldn't figure
out
Hi all,
What's the difference between the curvature and folding measures outputted
in the aparc stats files (i.e. mean, gaussian, folding index, and curvature
index)? Additionally, which measures are the most reliable for individual
differences?
Thanks,
Mike
Michael Kranz
Graduate Res
Nvm just read an old thread. Sorry about that.
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail//freesurfer/2011-August/019825.html
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Michael Kranz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a place where I could find an atlas with all of the Brodmann
> areas? O
Hi all,
Is there a place where I could find an atlas with all of the Brodmann
areas? Or is the one available with a portion of the areas the only
existing atlas?
Thanks,
Mike
___
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mg
istinguish. It depends on what you are after in your
> analysis if you need to take care or not.
>
> Regards,
>
> Martin
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 31.7.2013, at 23:23, Michael Kranz wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I was just wondering approximately how
Hi all,
If I process more subjects than the recommended amount given my number of cores
and memory, will this affect the stats/surfaces or just slow the process down?
I'm asking due to the sensitivity of workstations and also I seem to be getting
slightly different stats sometimes when I re-sub
Hi all,
I'm having trouble determining whether or not to use our T2 images for the
new pial refinement feature. *Most importantly, I'm wondering if our T2
image parameters are sufficient for the T2 pial refinement. The parameters
of our T2 images are as follows:*
T2 TSE overlay with a voxel size
16 matches
Mail list logo