...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: 4. oktober 2014 18:22
To: Leise Borg; freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] White matter and white matter lesions
On 10/4/14 12:35 AM, Leise Borg wrote:
> So - just to be sure - if I take labels 2, 7, 41, and 46 from aseg.mgz, then
> I have ALL white matter
file for this too?
-Leise
-Original Message-
From: Douglas N Greve [mailto:gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu]
Sent: 3. oktober 2014 18:55
To: Leise Borg; Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] White matter and white matter lesions
Those are the only WM labels present in the
Hi FreeSurfer
I need the white matter segmentations, and I've looked at some e-mail
correspondence and one answer I think I can use is the following:
If you just want white matter, then better to create a mask from the
aparc+aseg.mgz with mri_binarize with the --wm flag.
doug
I just don't underst
Hi FreeSurfer
I am working on a project concerning Alzheimer's patients and I need to know
the positions of white matter (WM) and white matter lesions (WML) from your
segmentations.
To find the WML, I use label 77 in the aparc.a2009s+aseg.mgz-files.
To find the WM, I use labels 2 and 41 in the
